Aid Means Terror: Piracy On The Die Seas

From 2010

Do all of you know those “what do you call a...” jokes? Those that say something like “What do you call a boy who raises a car to change a tyre? Answer: Jack.”

So, let’s ask a “What do you call a...” question, and see how many of you get the answer.

“What do you call a case where armed men raid a civilian ship carrying food and supplies, shoot many people dead, take control of the ship and sail it to a port controlled by those armed men?”

Now, unless you’ve never ever heard of the Spanish Main, Captains Kidd or Blackbeard, or more recently of Somalia, you’d probably say that the answer is (come on, don’t be shy – say it):

“Piracy.”

So far so good.

So, when the Zionazi pseudostate that calls itself “Israel” attacked an aid convoy on the high seas and shot dead 19 aid workers, followed by the forcible capture of a ship carrying such devastating instruments of war as wheelchairs, it wasn’t really doing anything new: it was just following in the footsteps of many an illustrious predecessor, all the way from times distant and mysterious to your local DVD store selling The Pirates of The Caribbean. 

Of course now, you know that pirates are glamorous, pirates are good, pirates are heroes who are sadly misunderstood. Pirates are cool, pirates are nice, pirates never listen to advice. Pirates get to make people walk the plank, and pirates have money in the bank. Pirates get the best bit of squeeze, for pirates the girls go weak in the knees.

Yes, I know, I know.

Anyway, the point is that even pirates need to defend themselves. That’s an inalienable right. Oh, like, for example, when you board a ship that’s bringing food and medicines to a strip of territory whose people you are systematically starving and whom you are bent on driving into exile by all means possible, and the people on board, who include diplomats and suchlike scum, fight back with...uh...bottles and slingshots, or maybe metal rods...or something. Under these circumstances, you know, you’re perfectly justified in shooting nineteen of them dead with the paintball guns you were carrying; you've, in fact, showed great restraint in exterminating only nineteen of them.

Oh, and by the way: pretty powerful, those Zionazi paintball guns; I don’t think they’d be all that popular in paintball tournaments, do you? After all, these are obviously Al Qaeda terrorists you’re fighting; it’s no big deal for a country which shoots dead Palestinian kids – sorry, Hamas terrorists – for the crime of throwing stones at armoured tanks.

Right, I’ll cut the comedy. I know – who doesn’t? – that “Israel” is the so-called “Middle East’s” (a term that always makes me grit my teeth) great and good supporter of democracy, and flag-bearer of freedom, yada, yada, all evidence of brutal murderous criminality to the contrary. And I know – who doesn’t? – that a world which is prepared to overlook the murderous invasion of Gaza in December 2008 will do precious little to punish the Zionazi pseudostate for its latest crimes.

Not quite; actually, except in countries like India which while officially secular and neutral are bent on a not-particularly-secret programme to isolate, marginalise, and demonise Muslims, and see the Zionazi pseudostate as a “natural ally” in the anti-Muslim crusade, there’s widespread revulsion against the allegedly “democratic” state of “Israel” and its apartheid-surpassing crimes against the Palestinians. “Israel” would undoubtedly have paid a price for its crimes – a price that would deter it from committing any crimes at all; but for one factor. That factor is the support of the USA, a support that looks more and more bizarre by the day. After all, this is the same USA which allegedly pursues Somali pirates and “mass murdering dictators” but cossets and acts as the paymaster for Zionazi pirates and murderous pseudo-democrats.

Is the US therefore now giving a licence to Somali pirates to do what they will? Has Hassan from Kismayo now got the White House’s blessings for his piratical attacks? Why not? What’s gravy for the goose is gravy for the gander.

It might be interesting to see what will happen if the Turks carry out theirthreat to send future aid convoys under military escort, and the Zionazi pseudostate attempts to block them too. Which of its allies, old friend (and Korean War military ally) Turkey or tail-that-wags-the-dog “Israel”, will the US support?

Stupid question.

(Incidentally, I wonder whether the Zionazi people have thought of the price they, or their descendants, will be compelled to pay for their crimes when their pseudostate ultimately collapses in the course of time? I doubt it; but whatever price, in blood and tears, they are compelled to pay, it will not be sufficient.)

The Swastika Of David: Thoughts On The Future of Zionazism

Once in a long while, some things occur which register on the moral radar of anyone who doesn’t live under the metaphorical rock. When an occupied territory is placed under a virtual starvation embargo (1) for the crime of voting for the “wrong” people in a free and open election, and repeatedly attacked with force that isn’t so much disproportionate as so much out of proportion that one would compare it to shooting a howitzer at a mosquito (12), one might think that it would be one of those occasions.

But one might be wrong.

Then, when an international aid flotilla sets sail to deliver a purely symbolic amount of aid, which was carefully vetted before leaving harbour to ensure that it contained only humanitarian materials such as food, toys and wheelchairs, and is attacked by heavily armed commandos rappelling from helicopters, leaving nine aid workers dead (many of them having been shot multiple times), one might think it would be one of those occasions. (3)

Then again, one might be wrong.

If one disregards both the shrill and increasingly hysterical propaganda – virtually all of it too ludicrous for anyone to take seriously for a moment – emerging from the government and “defence” forces of the so-called state of “Israel”, and its supporters in Washington and elsewhere, and the voices of moral outrage from – presumably – more intelligent people, then one is left with the plaintive question of the uninformed: “How could Israel do this? Don’t they care for world opinion any longer?” 

A simple answer to that question would be “No.” But in this case, while the simple answer is undoubtedly correct in its own way, it’s just the tip of a much larger iceberg.

The fact, however unpleasant, is this: “Israel” is a Nazi state, and its current crimes are no more than the unmasking of the Nazism that is inherent in its structure.

Before I go on, let me introduce a personal note:

I belong to a family that has traditionally been extremely pro-Zionazi. I believe, in fact, that I’m the first member of the extended family to openly declare my animosity to Zionazism and all it stands for and my opposition to the so-called state of “Israel”.

I grew up listening to the mythology of heroic “Israel”, fighting off evil Arab (read “Muslim”; and the word “Muslim” in India, when used by non-Muslims, can almost automatically be taken to mean “evil”) enemies, struggling for its very existence. Those were, fortunately enough, the days when India had a comparatively principled foreign policy (instead of an American policy as it now has) and the newspapers felt free to print anti-Zionazi comment. 

Thus it was, in 1982, while I was listening to my dad assuring me that Syria was the villain who was to blame for the “Israeli” invasion of Lebanon, I could, at the exact same moment, be looking at a cartoon of Zionazi prime minister Menachem Begin sitting on a pyramid of skulls and gnawing on a bone while a city (Beirut) burned in the background. So pervasive, in fact, was my family’s pro-Zionazi propaganda that it couldn’t but have made me think that perhaps there was another side to the story. So I did a little research; and even then, back in the days long before the Internet, there was more than enough information to feed my need.

I simply couldn’t see, you know, how anyone could dispossess a people at gunpoint, force them into refugee camps, and declare that they had divine sanction for these crimes, and then go on to claim that they were only defending themselves when they invaded and murdered thousands of unarmed civilians and occupied even more territory. Somehow, it seemed to me that this was akin to a bank robber who sits on top of his pile of ill-gotten wealth, shoots all comers, and declares that he’s acting only in self-defence.

Before I was much older and wiser, I saw a larger parallel: the imperialist powers of the nineteenth century, occupying other peoples’ lands and then declaring that they had a “civilising mission” to do so, and more –

I saw a parallel with Nazi Germany and its search of Lebensraum in the East of Europe, where the native populace would be reduced to the positions of drawers of water and hewers of wood for the Aryan overlords. It’s by no means a far-fetched comparison: the early Zionists declared Palestine to be Lebensraum just as surely as Hitler would do Russia less than half a century later.

It seems to me, therefore, that my teenage reasoning is more than being borne out by these happenings of recent days.

If we are to compare Zionism with Nazism, obviously, we should be aware what Nazism is, and how Zionism measures up.

One of the cardinal features of Nazism is its extreme racism and its contempt for other peoples. For the Nazis the Slavic people of Eastern Europe, Russians and Poles and Ukrainians, were Untermenschen, “subhumans”, who existed only to serve the Nazi superman as slave labour. For the Zionazi, the Arabs are vermin (17) who deserve nothing except exile or extermination, who, in fact, are not human, but a species so far inferior that they have no rights at all (19). Laws are regularly passed (21) in the self-styled Zionazi Parliament, the Knesset, allowing official discrimination (22) against Arab “Israeli” citizens. And never forget that the Zionazi pseudostate was the one of the closest allies of the apartheid regime in South Africa (18).

Another of the cardinal features of Nazism is its reliance on unproven mythology as a basis for its claims. For the Nazi, the “Aryan”, specifically, Teuton, was a superior race, one responsible for virtually every advance that the human race had ever undertaken, and thus entitled to its rights as a Master Race irrespective of competing claims from other peoples. For the Zionazis, “Israel” was the Promised Land given to their ancestors by YHWH and therefore they, as the Chosen People, have overriding rights to it, no matter that millions of other human beings have been living there for millennia. In both cases, you see, the question isn’t open for discussion; it’s so because the Nazis/Zionazis say it’s so. Even if reputable Orthodox Jewish rabbis say (16) that the Zionazi pseudostate is directly against the precepts of the Jewish religion, what the Zionazi pseudostate says is true simplybecause the Zionazi pseudostate says it’s so. 

A third feature of Nazism has always been its extreme militarism. The Nazis positively worshipped the military; while Hitler had a personal contempt for the officer caste, he, and the Nazis in general, fell over themselves building up the military forces and putting every possible man in uniform. What this meant was that these forces became utterly useless unless utilised in war, and war became even more inevitable than it already was. The Zionazi pseudostate, even before its inception, has never been more than a military state, one built round its defence forces (20), where every citizen is first a soldier and then a reservist; and even a cursory examination of its history will reveal that since the 1950s, it has always instigated and started wars, up to and including the present day (not excepting the war of 1973 which was caused by its occupation of Egyptian and Syrian territory). 

Fourthly, Nazism has been known for its capitalism-friendly nature. The Nazis claimed to be socialists (the word “Nazi” is a contraction of the German for “National Socialist”, and the full name of the party wasNational Sozialistiche Deutsche Arbeiters Partei, National Socialist German Workers’ Party) but once in power crushed trade unions, imprisoned anyone of the slightest leftist pretension, and supplied slave labour to such industrial concerns as Krupp and BMW. The Zionazi pseudostate was initially set up by leftists thinking of building an egalitarian society, but has always (despite socialist pretences) been extremely capitalism friendly (14), one reason for the West’s backing it to the hilt against such socialist regimes as Gamel Abdel Nasser’s Egypt, which was invaded in 1956 for the crime of nationalising the Suez Canal.

All right wing movements, Nazism most of all, have been characterised by a relatively small group arrogating to itself the right to speak for the people as a whole, and calling anyone who thinks otherwise a traitor. The Nazis spoke for all “Teutonic” people, and Hitler actually made plans to deport the entire Dutch nation as punishment for opposing the plans of their fellow Nordic supermen. The Zionazi pseudostate claims to speak for all Jews, everywhere, even though only a tiny fraction of them live in Occupied Palestine and there are many, many of them who despise, detest and abhor the crimes of Zionazism (15).

Then again, Nazism was initially shy about its aggressive military practices, lying repeatedly when required. When it invaded Poland in September 1939, it was the Poles who had allegedly attacked a German radio station in Silesia, and bodies of concentration camp inmates dressed in Polish uniforms were left as “proof” of the attack (surely a rather preposterously slim grounds on which to go to war). As the war went on, though, such delicacy was abandoned in favour of naked aggression, until towards the end when suddenly the Nazis – about to be overwhelmed by the Red hordes from the east – discovered that they were fighting in defence of “Western civilisation”. The Zionazis have long since quietly abandoned the pretext that they have been fighting for self-preservation as a nation state, but still provide pro-forma justifications (6) for their aggressive military actions, excuses as transparently fake (9) as those of the Nazis in Poland. And, whenever pressed hard by inconvenient facts, they have fallen back on the claim that they are the “lone bastion of freedom in the Middle East (sic).”

Just as Nazism used terror to subdue subject peoples - open, mass-punishment terror - the Zionazi pseudostate has never tried to pretend that it uses anything but terror as a tool. Here's a quote from a Zionazi commander (12): 

As Israel's most prominent military analyst, Zeev Schiff, summarized his remarks, "the Israeli Army has always struck civilian populations, purposely and consciously...the Army, he said, has never distinguished civilian [from military] targets...[but] purposely attacked civilian targets." The reasons were explained by the distinguished statesman Abba Eban: "there was a rational prospect, ultimately fulfilled, that affected populations would exert pressure for the cessation of hostilities." 

One shouldn’t forget that both Nazism and Zionazism are remarkably intolerant towards dissent. The Zionazi pseudostate hasn’t yet gone to the extent of imprisoning dissenters in concentration camps, like the Nazis did, but it doesn’t have to; it can call dissenters traitors (13). Also, it’s got the world’s largest open-air de facto concentration camp/ghetto (1) lying right under its guns in Gaza, and Arabs who have the misfortune to fall afoul of the regime can simply be threatened with loss of citizenship and deported or pushed into that territory. And while “Israeli” peace activists are today isolated and nearly helpless (10), international peace activists like Noam Chomsky (a Jew himself, remember) are no longer welcome (11).

No description of the features of Nazism could ever be complete without its celebration of violence. Nazism was all about violence; violence came to be, virtually, the national religion, war its only real ideology. The Nazi revelled in violence simply because he could inflict it, and planned the inflicting of that violence in the minutest detail. The Zionazi loves violence (4), he rejoices in it, and even more so when the opponent cannot fight back in any way worth calling a fight. This is why Zionazis are filling the streets of the cities of Occupied Palestine (7) exulting in the massacre of aid workers and believing, or pretending to believe, the explanation that fighting back against an armed boarding mission with sticks and bottles (9) deserved lethal force including people being shot multiple times in the head and chest. This is why the Gaza Massacre of 2008 even happened (12).

There are, it seems to me, enough parallels between Zionism and Nazism to be getting on with.

Therefore, once we come back to the question asked by so many, “Doesn’t Israel care for world opinion any longer?” the answer isn’t just “no”, but the answer is that “Israel” can’t care for world opinion. It’s not in the nature of the Nazi beast.

Something that has to be clearly understood if one is to understand Zionism is the attitude of the United States of America. I don’t think it’s an exaggeration in any way to say that for the Zionazi, all that matters so far as the outside world is concerned is the USA. None of crimes of the Zionazi pseudostate would even have been contemplated but for the unswerving and often arguably treasonous support of successive US governments, right from the sinking of the USS Liberty (23) in 1967 to the murder of a US citizen in the Aid Flotilla, shot four times in the head by the heroic Zionazi commandos fighting in self-defence (5). This includes the widespread suspicion (8) that the terrorist attack of 11 September 2001 (if indeed it was a terrorist attack) was known in advance to Zionazi spies and allowed to happen in order to radicalise American opinion against Arabs. 

The myth of Heroic “Israel” is primarily an American-invented and American-fostered myth, still sedulously propagated by Zionazi lobbies in the US and by mainstream American media. It takes a special, almost uniquely American, gall to claim that Zionazis who bomb and starve (12) over a million and a half Palestinians are doing so in self-defence, but that any Palestinian who fights back against a society where every adult is either a soldier or a reservist is a “terrorist”; even more gall to ignore illegal Zionazi settlements on Palestinian territory (said settlements being illegal under international law even if you pretend that the Zionazi pseudostate is legitimate) but claim the Palestinians deserve what happened to them because they voted, in a US-supervised election, for the “wrong people” (HAMAS). Today, the US is more than bending over backwards to protect the Zionazi pseudostate over its crimes against the aid ships, and if tomorrow it invades Iran, it will do so for one real reason, and one reason only: because the Zionazi pseudostate wants it to.

The US, then, has always supported the pseudostate by any and all means possible, up to and including its own detriment, and the pseudostate virtually survives on billions of US dollars in subsidies and “aid”. Looked at from that angle, suddenly, in fact, the allegedly inexplicable US support to the Zionazi regime suddenly becomes explicable; it’s not the support of an ally, but that of a colonial overlord for a colony across the sea. And if the Zionazi pseudostate is an American colony, it can only be for one reason: to maintain an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” in West Asia, a base from which to intervene and control events. It becomes even more obvious when one notes that up to 1967, when there were many compliantly servile Arab regimes in the neighbourhood, the US was relatively even-handed in West Asia (back then Britain and France were the pseudostate’s chief backers). But after several of these servile regimes gave way to less controllable governments, suddenly the US discovered that “Israel” was a beacon of democracy and needed help and support.

Is it really necessary to point out the United State’s actual attitude towards real democratic governments worldwide that refuse to toe its line?

This fact, then, must be remembered: that the Zionazi pseudostate exists on American approbation. 

So, moving on, what can we say about the future of Zionazism, which is (if you haven’t forgotten) the raison d’être of this article? 

I believe that Zionazism’s future basically hinges on a few discernible factors.

1. First and foremost is the US support I just mentioned. Now, while the US support has so far been blatant (6) and officially unwavering, there’s evidence that it might not last forever (2). The Zionazi propaganda campaign in the US seems to have reached the point of diminishing returns, with approval ratings for the Zionazi pseudostate decreasing significantly. That in itself might not be sufficient, because the two political parties in America both depend on Zionazi funding, but there are a few other factors in play.

(a) The weakening of US power. The United States is an empire in decline, and the more it tries to spread itself over the globe and control everything, the more significantly its resources will be stretched to breaking point. The economic crash of 2008-09 is only the first stage of a long term breakdown of international economic arrangements as resources grow scarcer and the “new economy” shows just what it’s built of: hot air.

Therefore, the time will come when the US will find it impossible to militarily do “Israel’s” bidding and at the same time stave off the threats to its other far flung outposts of empire, threats which exist precisely because it has placed those outposts of empire. It will either have to choose between abandoning “Israel” or its empire; it will not be able to hold on to both.

Simultaneously or otherwise, the economic downturn of the US will mean that it cannot go on funding the Zionazi regime in the style to which the latter has become accustomed. Sooner or later the US will have to choose between beggaring itself or stopping funding the Zionazis.

In both instances, what this means is that the Zionazis will either find themselves abandoned militarily and financially, or else the US will continue to support them militarily and financially until it, unable to bear the burden (there’s always a last straw to break the camel’s back), collapses; at which point, in any case, the Zionazis will find themselves abandoned militarily and financially.

(b) The self-defeating nature of recent Zionazi crimes. There comes a point where, no matter how much spin you put on something, the truth is so blatantly self-evident that it becomes impossible to ignore. The Zionazis have certainly arrived perilously close to that point with the attack on the aid flotilla; no amount of lies will obscure what it was, a vicious and piratical attack. Constantly protecting and cosseting a criminal makes you an accessory to his crimes, as the US is beginning uneasily to be aware. Even Zionazism’s old friends, the British, have abandoned them now; Zionazism has – in truth – lost Europe. 

There are indications that even the Zionazis are beginning to realise this; the head of the Zionazi murder organisation called Mossad recently stated (24) that “Israel is becoming a liability to the US.” 

(c) The fact that the US needs “Israel” less than before. No longer does the US need the “unsinkable aircraft carrier” in West Asia; it’s back in control of Iraq, bleeding insurgency notwithstanding, and has no intention of ever leaving, promises to the contrary. It virtually occupies Kuwait. The Jordanian and Saudi monarchies wouldn’t last long unless supported by the US, and are aware of it, as are the vile dictatorships of Yemen and Egypt. “Israel’s” market value would seem to have degraded significantly, and even it must know it.

(d) The end of Arab oil. Let’s get this straight: the need for the unsinkable carrier in West Asia was all about oil, and the access to oil. The attitude of the West towards Arab oil has always been that it belonged to the West, and was theirs to exploit; it just happened, inconveniently, to be located under the sands of the West Asian desert.

But someday, inevitably, that oil will run out.

Once that happens, what do you think will be the response of the Americans? Will they still think it worthwhile to maintain their colonial base? Logic says no.

So, point number one: the American lifeline won’t last forever.
2. The higher demographic growth of the Arab populace. There’s no way the Zionazis will ever outbreed the Arabs, and sooner or later the pseudostate will be forced to contemplate the fact that there’s no way to further squeeze the Palestinians into the ever shrinking areas the pseudostate is willing to allow them to live out their miserable lives. Then, one of two things will happen: the Zionazis will either have to begin on a programme of mass deportation, genocide, and blatant ethnic cleansing, all of which will simply hasten the complete collapse of international support, including the vital American one; or else they will be compelled to allow in those people into the pure and unsullied land of “Israel” and convert it into a multireligious state, where Jews and Arabs can live as equals. Either will be the end of Zionazism as we know it today.

3. The increasingly racist/fascist character of the “Israeli” society, and the infiltration of aggressively fundamentalist religion into all facets of it. Far from being a beacon of hope and enlightenment in the benighted Arab lands, the Zionazi pseudostate is fast becoming a belligerent and chauvinistic regional bully, which claims now that Jews are genetically superior to Arabs (2,25), yet another Nazi trait. This is important because it will be this characteristic, more than all the others, that will make it impossible to step back from the brink of disaster.

4. The waning excuse of the Holocaust. As everyone knows, the standard excuse for “Israel’s” crimes against humanity is the genocide perpetrated by the Nazis just under seventy years ago on, among others, the Jews of Europe. Even though the Zionazi enterprise for setting up a Jewish state in Palestine long predated the Nazis (it can be dated to the Balfour Declaration of 1917, in fact) the excuse has always been that the Zionazi pseudostate in particular, and Jews in general, have a right to defend themselves against a new Holocaust.

It was never much of an excuse, and now it’s waning remarkably thin.

One of the biggest problems is that even the Holocaust has a shelf life, and now – getting on for seven decades since it ended – its impact is dissipating, especially when compared with the much more recent crimes of the Zionazi pseudostate, crimes that are played out on TV, and everything. Refusing to allow discussion on the Holocaust is no solution, because all it has done is give ammunition to those who think it was a lie.

Also, not even a logically challenged person can really believe the contention that “Israel” has to defend its existence anymore; not with its hundreds of nuclear weapons, its massive military forces, and its assured US support. What the Arabs didn’t do in 1948 they aren’t going to do now, and most of all not when half of their rulers depend on the US to survive.

Still less is it even conceivable that HAMAS or any other coalition of Palestinians will set up concentration camps complete with gas chambers and Zyklon B to exterminate world Jewry; in fact this is so ridiculous that not even the Zionazis have propounded this theory.

Therefore, with the knowledge of what the Zionazi society is, and what factors will influence it in the coming years, I believe that we can form some ideas of the eventual shape of Zionazism’s downfall.

First and foremost, one can not, now or in the foreseeable future, depend on the Zionazi populace suddenly developing good sense or empathy with those they oppress or destroy. They are on the fast track to open Nazism, and the fact is that when an extreme right wing government like Netanyahu’s comes to power by popular acclaim, any challenge to it will almost certainly come from even further to the right. 

"Land for peace" was always a chimera, because the Zionazi pseudostate actually claims even more land than it currently occupies, a so-called "Greater Israel"(27) , and the rabid rabbis who now rule the Zionazi military have refused to part with even a millimetre of land. 

As for future generations, I have little hope for a change of attitude since Zionazi children are systematically taught (26) from childhood to hate Arabs, just as the Hitler Youth were taught systematically to hate Jews.

Therefore, given time, we can safely predict a Zionazi regime so right wing that it will rival the Zealots of history.

Now, what does such a regime do when faced with the collapse of support from its main sponsor, and just about total international isolation? What does it do when faced with its own imminent demise?

You got it: war, war, and more war.

Therefore, when the time comes (and it will probably not be as far off in the future as most people think), expect massive aggression by the Zionazi pseudostate against all its neighbours, friendly or otherwise, in an effort to destroy as much as possible, and try to impose some kind of peace at gunpoint on the civilised world; or, if all fails, to take down as many of the hated Other as possible as it goes under. Mass use of nuclear weapons certainly can’t be ruled out.

How can I say this? I can say this because the Zionazis have modelled themselves so closely on the Nazis that the psychology ofGotterdämmerung will be in operation as completely as it was on Hitler’s minions. 

Of course I may be wrong, and perhaps the Zionazi pseudostate will step back from the brink, accept the rights of the Palestinians, and properly compensate them for its sins.

But, given the naked face of Zionist Nazism, I don’t think so.

Sources:

1. http://www.smh.com.au/world/inside-the-w....00604-xkmp.html

2. http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/21/israel-and-the-nutbar-factor/ 

3.http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/03/israel/index.html

4. http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/06/01/the-mediterranean-massacre/

5. http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/06/03/this-says-it-all/

6. http://www.lobelog.com/defending-israel-a-how-to-guide/

7. http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2010/06/03/m....israeli-attack/

8. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/govknow.html

9. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/....ed-1992517.html

10. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?265653

11. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?265616

12. http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20090119.htm

13. http://www.jnews.org.uk/commentary/why-dissent-in-israel-is-under-attack

14. http://www.monthlyreview.org/0103hanieh.htm

15. http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/

16. http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/

17. http://www.counterpunch.org/dasgupta07292006.html (A word about this link; it mentions Begin and another Zionazi commenting about Palestinians and calling them two-legged beasts and roaches, which undoubtedly occurred, though pro-Zionazi websites claim the context was mistaken; but it also mentions the Zionazi ambassador to Burma saying the Arabs weren’t human beings, which I haven’t seen any Zionazi site deny. Either way it proves Zionazi racism.)

18. http://www.africafiles.org/article.asp?ID=23779

19. http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=16828

20. http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1260658441


21. http://www.habibtoumi.com/2010/03/21/cur....sm-centre-says/

22. http://www.rense.com/general14/itisabsurd.htm

23. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident

24. http://mondoweiss.net/2010/06/mossad-chief-says-israel-is-a-burden-to-us.html

25. http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/07/the-israel-test.php

26. http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2507

27. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Israel

Zionism, Nazism: Studies in Evil

If there is such a thing as absolute evil, should we take two faces of it as Zionism and Nazism? The Zionists have been eager pupils of their erstwhile Nazi oppressors. Consider:
Nazis walled up Jews in ghettos, Zionists are creating ghettos with their Apartheid Wall in Palestine
Nazis denied Jews had a right to exist, Zionists deny Palestinians even exist.
Both Zionists and Nazis were/are dependent on support from industrialists and corporates.
Both Nazis and Zionists began/begin aggressive wars on total and ridiculous pretexts and claim they are the victimised party.
Both Zionists and Nazis claim/ed they have/had the right to kill anyone they wanted or attack any country they want(ed) in order to further the "national good".
Nazis began terror bombing of cities like Guernica and later Rotterdam, Stalingrad, Croydon, London. Zionists are terror bombing Lebanon and Gaza.
Nazis hate/d blacks, Zionists were the closest allies after the United States Of America of the anti-black apartheid regime of South Africa and helped test the South African nuclear bomb.
Nazis ignored treaties signed by them. "Israel" ignores treaties signed by it.
Nazis said anyone opposing them was an enemy of what they pretended was the white Aryan race; Zionists say anyone opposing them is an enemy of what they pretend is the Semitic race.
Nazis imprisoned anyone who did not agree with them, including the leaders of conquered countries; "Israel" imprisons anyone opposing it, including democratically elected Arab politicians.
Nazis worshipped armies and weapons and created a totally militarised society; "Israel" worships weapons and has a totally militarised society.
Nazis murdered millions of people in concentration camps; one does not doubt that "Israel", which has many times proposed the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, would murder them by the millions in concentration camps if they could get away with it.
Both Nazis and Zionists use/d collective punishments for individual "offences" (fighting for freedom).
Both Nazis and Zionists claim/ed the "right" to Lebensraum.

Hmm, difficult to choose...
Still, I'd say that Zionism is a WORSE evil than Nazism, simply because Zionists came to power afterwards and knew, from their own experiences, that what they were doing was evil and unacceptable, while in Nazi days such behaviour had been reserved for use against "uncivilised" lesser breeds like black Africans, Arabs (Iraq, 1920) and Native Americans.

Divide and Rule: HAMAS, Fatah, and the Gaza Civil War

(From 2007)

A long time ago, when a handful of white men ruled the non-white world, they found one of the perfect means of lording it over the rest with a minimum expenditure of blood, sweat and tears. It was one of the most brilliant pieces of evil thinking in the history of the world...exploit divisions, make the natives fight each other, and step in as the only "guarantor" of peace.

It was called "divide and conquer" or "divide and rule".

The age of imperialism - it seemed - had ended with the Second World War, and it did, except in one part of the world, where it flourished with the blessings of those who should have known better.

Now, of course, that old-fashioned imperialism is making a comeback, its methods are making a comeback as well. In Iraq, the US now intends to keep a permanent presence, which translates into a permanent insurgency. (Whether that intention can actually be translated into capability is something else). And meanwhile...

Meanwhile, the Zionist Nazi tail that wags the American dog is carrying out its very own little divide and rule policy in Occupied Palestine (I mean the so-called Palestinian Territories. Of course in reality they, and the territory officially constituting the so-called state of "Israel", together constitute Palestine). It's a classic example of the policy, and it even appears to be succeeding.

This is how they started...

First, they ignored the Oslo accord they themselves signed, knowing perfectly well that the US would back them, blindly, in anything they did.

Then, they shelled and besieged Yasser Arafat in his headquarters, keeping him a prisoner until his weird and inexplicable death.

Then, they said that they would not negotiate with the Palestinians since there was nobody left to negotiate with (big surprise, since they had systematically murdered any credible figure who was willing to negotiate).

After that, they foisted a totally corrupt and ineffectual "Palestinian government" of Abu Mazen on the Palestinian people. ThisFatah "government" - which, let's remember, was secular - spent its time building mansions and holidaying abroad, and - not unnaturally - turned the people's support to its ideological opposite, the Islamic movement Hamas.

Then they made a big mistake, allowing an election in Gaza last year in January. It was a big mistake because people voted for those willing to stand up against corruption and against oppression, which meant they voted for Hamas. This victory in a democratic election brought forth howls of rage and dismay from America and Europe. So much for democracy.

In fact, it seems to have struck nobody that Hamas, by participating in a democratic exercise, was actually trying to enter the mainstream, and should be encouraged. But that is typical fascist thinking for you, which brooks no other viewpoint but one's own. Hamas was promptly embargoed, and the Zionazis held back the funds that were rightfully the property of the Palestinian government. This was of course theft, but for a "nation" founded on theft, which has stolen and robbed the very soil on which it exists, it can't have meant a great big deal. It meant in practical terms that the Hamas  government was unable to pay the salaries of its workers - and that meant losing their support.

Remember that this sabotage of democracy was all in the name of "freedom" and for the advantage of the so-called state of "Israel", which pretends to be a democracy (yeah, like apartheid South Africa was a democracy).

Although Hamas declared a unilateral ceasefire against "Israel", the Zionazis continued to bomb and shoot and murder Palestinians on a daily basis.

Ultimately Hamas, which won the elections fair and square, was forced into a "unity government" with the defeated, discredited, Fatah, just to get the aid and funds that were its by right.

Now that's democracy, ain't it?

And now that open conflict rages in Gaza between the two sides, it's a fairly good guess that (since Hamas is winning) weaponry and funds will be flooding in from "Israel" to help Fatah - the same Fatah which was attacked and besieged, whose internationally respected leader was confined to a few rooms in his own headquarters and more likely than not murdered, and which was reduced to irrelevance and condemned as a terrorist organisation.

And, whoever wins or loses in the current fighting, "Israel" will then claim that the Palestinians are 1. too unruly and 2. too well armed to be allowed to rule themselves.

Divide and rule isn't dead. It seems to have only just begun its second innings.

Remember the Shia Sunni civil war in Iraq as well...?  

Gaza and "Israel": The Nature Of The Beast

From January 2009, showing the more things change, the more they remain the same:


Let’s play one of those “imagine” games that I make you people play so often on this blog.

So imagine…

Imagine, let’s say, that you and your large family live in a house. As houses go, it might not be too grand, but it serves your purposes, shelters you, allows you to live a fairly contented life, and the garden, while not all that well tended perhaps, produces enough to feed you all.

Now suppose there is an act of arson in a far city over the horizon, an act of arson that burns down a building and kills some of its residents. Imagine, then, that these survivors then quit the city – even though the arsonists have been caught and punished –and come over to your house. They claim that long, long ago, some of their forefathers lived where your house now stands, and since one of those forefathers was told in a dream by his personal deity that he had been given the land by that deity, therefore you must vacate the land and move out. What you think or want, what your rights may be, or whether you have any say at all in the matter is not important. And, because the residents of the city where they lived earlier, and other people elsewhere, feel kind of guilty over the arson (and because they see a wonderful opportunity to get these people off their hands), they support those usurpers, give them arms and weapons, and you find yourself thrown out of your house, and, at gunpoint, driven to a tiny mud outhouse in one corner of your own property. And the people who took over your house have made themselves a mansion there, paid for with foreign money, and boast that not only will they prevent you from ever returning, but that they have a right to your land because they (with foreign money) have “developed” that land beyond all recognition.

Now if you’re a normal human at all, you would not be happy about this state of affairs, would you? And you would be even less happy if the usurpers then proceeded to wall off your tiny mud outhouse with barbed wire, kidnapped and detained your family members on suspicion, and proceeded to impose a starvation level embargo on you. And suppose a few of your household then took what weapons they had (pea-shooters or at the most air-guns) and began taking pot-shots at the usurpers, would they really be to blame?

Well, it seems, according to the neocons, they would.

If there is one thing that exposes the true nature of the Zionist beast, it is this comment by the so-called Defense (sic – not only because of the misspelling of “Defence”, but because of the implication that anything the illegal Zionazi state does is in self-defence) Minister of “Israel”, in March 2008, threatening to unleash a holocaust on Gaza. As I pointed out here, the Holocaust has been positively the best thing that ever happened to the so-called state of “Israel”: it gives it a raison d’etre, a shield for all its crimes, and a ready-made excuse for all the crimes it plans in future. Ah yes, the Holocaust. Such a useful thing. All those concentration camps, the gas chambers, the crematoria. So ineradicably imprinted in Zionazi memory. And yet here the Zionazis, who scream to the skies that the Holocaust “must never happen again”, are threatening to unleash it on Gaza, that is, Occupied Palestine. That was in March. Nine months later, the baby conceived then was born. What we are hearing now, in the crash of exploding Zionazi ordnanceand the screams of disembowelled Palestinian children, are its birth cries. In the next year or so, it’s going to stand up and walk, and in the years to come, it is going to begin to devour the subject peoples alive.

I don’t think there are too many people who actually believe the argument that a few inaccurate and puny Qassam rockets could possibly be a threat of any nature to any nation, let alone a threat so grave that that nation (or, in this case, “nation”) has to carpet bomb that walled off open-air prison compound. The Nazi attack on the Warsaw ghetto comes to mind. Yes, there are Zionaziphiles and other right wing vermin who can pretend to believe this excuse, but it’s a pretence, no more.

No, the real reason has nothing really to do with Gaza at all, and everything to do with the nature of the Zionist beast, as I said above. The Zionists are Nazis, as I have said, and loyal and devoted students of the original Nazis. Like the Nazis they are driven by hatred of all other peoples, specifically people who look, speak or act slightly differently, and loves to pass off these people as an existential threat. And like the original Nazis, for whom war was the highest state of being and who used Aryan mythology to justify their crimes, the Zionazis are wedded to constant war and use Jewish mythology to justify their crimes.

Constant war is so useful after all!

Consider:
1.    Constant war keeps the population in line and in a constant state of fear, where nobody dares raise his or her voice for fear of being called a traitor;
2.    Constant war allows one to impose whatever crimes one wishes on the enemy peoples;
3.    Constant war creates constant demand, and as long as one is winning, it means stimulation of the economy.

It’s only when one begins to lose that constant war becomes a drag…but if you choose your enemies carefully, and more importantly you enlist the neighbourhood mafia warlord on your side, there is no chance of losing.

Which brings us to the question: just why is the mafia warlord on your side?

I know there are some people who choose to delude themselves into believing that there is no such thing as a Jewish lobby in the US. It’s a particularly crass delusion because the lobby doesn’t just exist, it makes no attempt to hide. It’s open, aggressive, and unapologetic about its support for Zionazi crimes, including Zionazi crimes against the US itself. And yet, such is its power that no US politician dares not to fall before it in competitive prostration – not in the least one alleged Messiah, the Saint Barack O’Bama. And yet, its clout does not come from the votes of the Jewish population of the US, not all of whom, in any case, support the Zionazi vermin (as it is, there are many anti-“Israel” Jewish groups like Neturei Karta, and the existence of “Israel” is against Judaic principles anyway). Nor can the Jewish lobby wield such financial clout that it outweighs common humanity or at least hard headed common sense, which says that spending billions in subsidising “Israel” is money thrown down the drain. No, I believe that the reasons for the blind worship of the Jewish lobby is a part of that peculiar American syndrome of worshipping something just because “it has always been done” – like the idiotic insistence on refusing to use the metric system, as I said a little while ago. American politicians crawfish to the Jewish Lobby because they have traditionally done so and must keep doing so, they believe, if they are to get elected. That’s all there is to it.

So, the Zionazi state of “Israel” can get away with turning Gaza into a gigantic concentration camp, barbed-wired off, with entry restricted and even the import of shoes prohibited (because, o wonders, shoes can be part of military uniforms) – and the political system of the US, which could bring “Israel” to its knees in 24 hours by snapping its fingers, chooses to support it instead, and blames the victims of “Israel” for their own plight. So when there is a democratic election in Gaza andHAMAS wins, that government can be banned and embargoed, and acivil war artificially brought about, because “Israel” did not like the way the election turned out – and it is HAMAS, America says, which is to blame. Similarly, for years now, “Israel” has been bombing, shelling and murdering Palestinians in Gaza, refusing them even human status (as the so-called Prime Minister of “Israel”, the Zionazi Golda Meir, once said, “Israel” was a land without a people for a people without a land) – and it was the Palestinians who were to blame. The logic is impeccable. If a Palestinian kid throws a stone at a Zionazi tank, it is entirely in “self-defense” (sic, and sick) that the Zionazis will level the entire street. Mass punishment for individual acts was another Nazi trait the Zionazis have enthusiastically embraced. It is the nature of the beast.


In this highly interesting article, Justin Raimondo argues that the current wave of murderous Zionazi attacks on Gaza (which in any  case won’t destroy HAMAS) are basically meant to influence the next elections in “Israel” (fat lot of difference it makes who wins, as far as the human population of the world is concerned) and to present St Barack O’Bama, accused of being a – gasp – closet anti-Zionist, with a fait accompli. I do agree that those are legitimate arguments, but I also believe that:

1.    The aforementioned St Barack O’Bama is a con artist who has conned his way to the White House and will reveal his true (not skin) colours once he is in the Oval Office, and those colours are likely to be no different from those of his predecessor; and
2.    That after its crushing defeat to Hizbollah in Lebanon in 2006, and with the planned invasion of Iran becoming more difficult by the day (what with the Russians giving the Iranians missiles with which to defend themselves), the Zionazi military needs a relatively swift and bloody victory, no matter how illusory, to retain its pre-eminence in the Land of Eternal War.

As I have also argued in earlier blog posts, in the long run, of course, “”Israel” is doomed. American power, which is really all that props the racist Zionazi regime up, is declining; the American economy is folding up, and even if it recovers it will never reach the heights it once did. Under these circumstances, if the Americans choose to continue to pay off the Zionazis, they hasten their own economic collapse. If they choose not to pay off the Zionazis, the Zionazis collapse. And, meanwhile, however many Palestinians you murder, you can’t kill ‘em all; and the remainder will take revenge, constant revenge, which will grow more sure and effective as your own strength becomes dissipated and decreases. And as it does, the higher birthrate of the Arabs will finally submerge your so-called nation of faux-Semitic illegal immigrants in a (genuinely) Semitic sea.

There is one peculiar characteristic of the Zionazi pseudo-state that I ought to mention here: of all countries in the world, it is possibly the only one of which you cannot say that “terrorists killed innocent people”. There are no such creatures as innocent “Israelis”: each one is armed and trained to kill, steeped in anti-Palestinian bloodlust. Any “Israeli” who thinks otherwise should have left the pseudo-state, and many have. Those that haven’t deserve whatever fate befalls them. And when the time comes, when the Arabs finally take over, I hope that fate will be both spectacularly gruesome and excruciating.

It may not happen soon, but it will happen someday.

Meanwhile, it is absolutely no surprise that the Hindunazi brigade in India is cheering on the Zionazi scum: it’s just what they wish they themselves had the power to do, to massacre Muslims and leftists and other Untermenschen. And the ultra-pro-American Indian government will go to any extent to avoid pissing off Washington; which is why there has not been a single concrete action against “Israel,” however symbolic: not one contract cancelled, not one diplomat recalled “for consultations”. Well, if India wishes to swim with the crocodiles, it should be prepared to get eaten.

You’ve taken a people’s land from them. That was only the beginning.

You’ve then gone further - imprisoned this people in a giant open-air prison, walled and hemmed them in with barbed wire, imposed sanctions on them so severe that they can’t even import shoes. You’ve let them have a “democratic” election and then refused to acknowledgethe victors since they were not the side you wanted to win. So you tightened the sanctions, continued to drop bombs on them and shell them, and so on. All in the name of your “national security”. That poor, imprisoned, starving, shoeless people will just defeat your super-strong military otherwise with their few rifles and their petrol bombs and crude harmless home-made rockets.

But your bombing and sanctions haven’t had the desired effect, and elections are approaching fast. Your opponent is painting you as “soft”. You have to prove you’re tougher than they are. Since you’ve already lost one war and another big war is difficult to launch (that adversary is far too tough to beat easily, and getting tougher by the day) what better than to attack that open-air concentration camp?

So you set out to bomb that camp to cinders, knowing that, no matter how many women and children you kill, there won’t be a price to pay because you have the backing of the only official superpower. You bomb mosques and hospitals and schools, and whatever else strikes your fancy, but that might not be enough to win the election. What more can you do?

Well, you can launch a full-scale ground offensive into that concentration camp, that ghetto, like your Nazi mentors had done against your own ancestors not very long ago, at Warsaw. You can do that and destroy more schools and hospitals and mosques, and kill thousands of more people. You have, after all, armour and artillery and rockets and aeroplanes and the enemy has AK47s and not much else.

But what will that get you? Merely the hatred of more and more people, and – despite Hyperpower support - the reaction may get uncomfortable. There is a limited amount of hiding one can do behind the Holocaust, after all.

Today, the illegal, racist, criminal “Israeli” (Zionazi) regime launched an invasion of Gaza, after bombing it for about a week. Considering that back in 1967, as Zionist propagandists remind us endlessly, the Zionists defeated three Arab countries – much better armed than HAMAS – in six days, this would seem to be some kind of, let’s say, overkill. And, boy, when we say kill, we mean kill.

If they had to invade Gaza after all, what was the point of the carpet-bombing? And if they did not have to invade Gaza, if the bombing was enough, why invade? (I know, I know, rhetorical questions.)

The silence from the Indian government is deafening but predictable. But there’s another source of deafening silence – the Saint Barack O’Bama apparently knoweth not what is going on in Gaza – or anywhere else for that matter.

The destruction of the Warsaw ghetto didn’t save the Nazis from annihilation. The invasion of Gaza won’t save the Zionazis. But, when the history of the Zionazi state is written down, a century or so hence, it will go down as another moment of infamy.